Computing Machinery and Intelligence
I propose to consider the question, 'Can machines think?'
¶
The imitation game
¶
Turing sidesteps metaphysics. Instead of defining "think," he asks whether a machine could converse well enough to pass as human. The Turing test became folklore, but the deeper move is operational: make the question testable.
¶
Objections examined
¶
Turing walks through nine objections (theological, mathematical, Lady Lovelace's "only knows what we tell it," and others) with patient engineering humor. Many still appear in modern debates about LLMs.
¶
Still the starting point
¶
Every discussion of machine intelligence eventually returns here. The paper is short, readable, and unsettling in how much it anticipates. We still dispute the same terms Turing tried to dissolve.